- Temrel
- Posts
- From Prompt Monkey to Context Engineer
From Prompt Monkey to Context Engineer
How to stop winging it and start engineering real autonomy with your AI agents

Remember when prompting felt like casting spells? You’d chant something like “Write me a Python app that tracks mood via emojis”, hit enter, and cross your fingers. If the result wasn’t gibberish, you’d shout “AI is amazing!” and carry on. If it was, you tweaked the wording and hoped for better.
Welcome to the age of Prompt Monkeys: desperate, hopeful, copy-pasting operators who built nothing consistently but dreams.
That era is over.
If you want to work with real autonomy-supporting AI agents—especially coding agents like Claude, GPT-4, or open-source stacks—you need more than a good prompt. You need context engineering.
You are now the architect of context
Being a Context Architect means designing a world around the task, not just shouting instructions at your assistant and hoping for divine intervention.
Coding agents don’t thrive on vibes. They thrive on well-defined artefacts, clarity of purpose, and a shared working memory. That means constructing a lightweight but structured environment that mirrors how a real dev would work.
So if you want your AI agent to behave like a dev, give it what a dev expects.
The essential scaffolding for coding agents
Here’s what good context engineering looks like in practice when setting up a codebase for an AI assistant:
1. README.md
Tell the agent what the repo is for. It should include:
Purpose of the repo or system
The problem being solved
Who it’s for
Key features (bullet points are fine)
Think of it as onboarding. Give the agent context from the jump.
2. architecture.md
Explain how the system is structured. Include:
Diagrams if possible (even just markdown ASCII art)
Core services/modules
Data flows
External dependencies or APIs
This doc helps the agent reason about system design before touching a single file.
3. component_name.md
briefs
Want it to write a new module? Give it a mini-spec first:
What the component does
Inputs and outputs
Key logic or edge cases
Example usage
This saves a dozen rounds of “No, that’s not quite it.”
4. tests/
folder with examples
Prewritten tests serve two purposes:
They clarify what “done” means.
They allow the agent to check its own work.
Tests are context. They reduce hallucination risk. Use them.
5. output.md
or comments in existing files
If you're asking the agent to generate something—like a script or a deployment file—give it a clear target:
Preferred file structure
Formatting conventions
Output style (e.g. verbose logging vs terse output)
Avoid vague requests like “make it better” unless you’re trying to have a philosophical debate.
Here’s what changes when you do it right
Let's make the shift crystal clear:
This isn’t just about polishing your inputs. It’s about operationalising the environment your agent works in.
Action steps: start being a Context Architect today
You don’t need to boil the ocean. Try this:
Pick a repo or project you're working on.
Add a basic
README.md
describing the system's purpose.Write an
architecture.md
that sketches the main components.Define a brief for one module and ask your agent to build it from that.
Watch the difference.
Why this matters
In the very near future, you won’t be hiring junior devs—you’ll be onboarding AI agents. Your job is to hand them a runway.
If you give them mess, they’ll give you mess back.
But if you design a thoughtful, minimal context—complete with the right scaffolding—you can 10x what you get from today’s most powerful models.
That’s not just prompting. That’s engineering.
How useful was this newsletter? |